Ternak Hāsidīn: A Satirical Legal-Tech Concept, From Hasad to Harvest

This is a satire. "Ternak Hāsidīn" is a made-up product concept in eight slides (originally in Indonesian, redrawn here in English), written to make a serious point: when many accounts attack one person online, the useful response is calm documentation, not a fight. It is not a real service, it names no one, and none of the prices or percentages are real offers.

The idea in one line

The name plays on two Indonesian ideas. Ternak means to breed livestock. Hāsidīn is the plural of hāsid, "one who envies," from the verse the deck quotes: "Wa min sharri ḥāsidin idzā ḥasad," "and from the evil of the envier when he envies" (QS Al-Falaq). The joke is that you don't fight the envious, you "farm" them. The serious version is: don't feed trolls, document what they do.

The deck's motto is four verbs: Observe. Preserve. Verify. Act lawfully.

Slide 1: From Hasad to Harvest

The pitch is passive, lawful observation of a public digital trail, written up as a structured, fair and verifiable report. The flow runs from hasad (envy) to a post, to a digital trace, to the "harvest." The slide states its limits too: this is not for entrapping anyone, manipulating anyone or abusing legal process. "Justice is not a game."

Slide 2: The internet is full of hāsidīn

One person may make one post, but hostile accounts rarely arrive alone. The deck shows the usual shapes: replies, quote-posts, rumors, screenshots stripped of context, reposts and long threads. Its counter-slogan, "Hāsidīn Together Strong," is a parody of a familiar crowd chant. The arithmetic joke is 1 post, 5 replies, 20 accounts, 100 screenshots. Its closing line is the one I like best: "The truth walks slowly. Hāsidīn use fiber optic."

Slide 3: Don't fight hāsidīn. Ternakkan.

Four stages: Seed (one defamatory act appears), Grow (other accounts comment, spread it or add new accusations), Observe (document the digital trail lawfully) and Harvest (evaluate legal steps against each act, individually). The slide's own summary: "Evidence grows. Screenshots compound."

Slide 4: Top up defendant

This slide mocks a game top-up screen with an "Add defendant" button. The categories are anonymous account, reposter, original poster and coordinated account, each "+1." The disclaimer carries the real point: one report does not automatically make everyone a suspect. One chain of events can involve many people whose actions and responsibility differ, and each has to be assessed separately.

Slide 5: Referral Hāsidīn

This slide takes a loyalty program and aims it at the troll network: "Hāsidīn A invites B, B identifies C." It offers a "5% civil settlement benefit," a loyalty ladder (1, 5, 10 and 20 referrals) and a final tier called "Civil Peace Unlocked*." The footnote is the honest part. Civil settlement, restorative justice and criminal proceedings are governed by law and by the authorities, and must never be presented as a transaction or a guaranteed outcome.

Slide 6: Why sue alone?

A parody pricing page, "Paketan Perdata" (civil-law bundles): Solo Hāsidīn (1 party, Rp 999K), Hāsidīn Pack (5 parties, "most popular," Rp 4.999K) and Panen Raya (20+ parties with a network visualization and a consolidated evidence map, Rp 19.999K). The tagline, "Ape Together Strong. Evidence Together Stronger," is again borrowed from crowd culture. The disclaimer says the packages promise no damages, no victory and no particular result, because outcomes depend on the law and on the court. These prices are a joke about how legal services get packaged, not an offer.

Slide 7: Month 5, Panen Raya

The timeline runs from month 0 (first incident) through more hāsidīn arriving, screenshots, evidence mapping and legal review, to month 5, "harvest." The mock dashboard has an account grid, a timeline, evidence snapshots and a relationship graph. The slide warns against reading "month 5" as a universal legal formula. Filing deadlines, the elements of an offense, the reporter's standing, jurisdiction and the applicable law all have to be checked independently for every case.

Slide 8: Don't feed the troll. Document the behavior.

The last slide compresses everything into a pipeline: 20 anonymous avatars, then an evidence database, then the scales of justice. It is labeled "a satirical legal-tech concept."

What I think is serious under the joke

• Preserve before you react. Screenshots with URLs, dates and context, saved calmly, are worth more than an angry reply.
• Treat every account individually. An original poster, a reposter and a coordinated account are different acts, and a pile-on is not one offense.
• Don't promise outcomes. Anyone who sells a guaranteed win, a "5% settlement benefit" or a fixed timeline is selling something the law does not give.
• Stay lawful. Passive observation of public posts is one thing. Entrapment, impersonation or manipulation is another, and it would destroy your own case.

Limits of this post

• The deck is satire and a thought experiment. No such service exists, and the prices, tiers and percentages are jokes.
• The slides shown here are English redraws of the original Indonesian deck, with simplified graphics. The avatars are generic icons and represent no real accounts or people.
• Nothing here is legal advice. I am not a lawyer. For a real incident, talk to a qualified Indonesian lawyer about deadlines, evidence rules and which steps fit your situation.
• This post is a visual, satirical companion to my earlier essay, Ternak Hasidin, the 6-Month Harvest. Read that one for the longer written argument.