Case Record: Dimas Agung Hendarto and the LinkedIn Condition
This post records messages I received from a sender who introduced themselves as "Agung, lawyer", saved in a phone under the contact name "Dimas A. Hendarto". I refer to them as Dimas Agung Hendarto. That full name is my own combination of the contact name and the name the sender used, and I have not verified the sender's identity. It is not a court filing or a finding, and I do not assert that anyone is guilty of an offence.
Background
On 14 July 2026 I was at Polsek Cisauk for a witness clarification in a defamation report made by a former HR manager of my employer. I had filed my own police report that morning. At the station a peace agreement was put in front of me, and I signed it. In my account I was rushed and not allowed to read it carefully. The agreement, as I understand it, required me to delete my professional LinkedIn profile in exchange for the report being withdrawn. The firm representing the other side appeared, according to my records, to be Hendarto, Saryanto & Partners (HSP).
The message
Later, after my LinkedIn profile was active again, a message reached a family member's phone from a sender who wrote, in my translation: "Good evening. I am Agung, the lawyer who was at Polsek Cisauk meeting Mr. Fuad and Mr. Rahmat Wibowo. I have learned that Mr. Rahmat's LinkedIn, which we asked to be deleted at that time, has been switched back on. We await your good faith to delete it again in accordance with the original agreement, or we will process it again at the police." A screenshot of my public LinkedIn profile was forwarded with it. The message is undated in my capture, and I do not know to whom it was first sent.
A separate message
On 23 July 2026 a different contact, saved as "Pengacara Dinda" (Dinda's lawyer), wrote to me that they would block me, that they awaited deletion of my LinkedIn "according to our agreement, because the basis for withdrawing the report is deleting your LinkedIn", and that if it was switched back on the report would be reopened. I do not know whether this contact and "Agung" are the same person.
Why I raise it
My reading is that a criminal report was being tied to a civil condition, deleting a professional profile, which has no obvious link to what the report alleged. I also note that the agreement itself, as I understand it, provides for disputes about its terms to go to the South Tangerang district court. In my complaint to the police I call this a coercion issue. That is my legal reading and an investigator would have to test it. I had given the other side the contact of my own lawyer on 3 June 2026, yet this message went to my family instead.
Limits of this record
- This is my account; no court or authority has made a finding.
- The sender's identity and authority are unverified, and the contact name is a label I or a family member saved.
- The message is undated and its original recipient is unclear.
- I have not attached the agreement's text here.
- I am not a lawyer, and this post is not legal advice.
Right of reply and correction
Dimas Agung Hendarto, or the person who wrote these messages, is invited to respond, correct, or add context, including to say who they are and for whom they acted. A substantive reply may be published alongside this article, edited only for privacy, safety and relevance. If reliable evidence shows any statement here is wrong, including the identification, I will correct it and note the change.
#Somasi #LegalNotice #DigitalConduct