Letter of Demand No. 042/SOMASI/RW/VIII/2026: Aurelia Vizal (English + 中文 律師函)

Bilingual edition (English and Traditional Chinese). Somasi No. 042/SOMASI/RW/VIII/2026 is a formal legal notice I sent on 31 August 2026 to Ms. Aurelia Vizal, who is a student in Taiwan. Because she lives and studies in Taiwan, I issued a Chinese-language version of the letter with Hanyu Pinyin. This is a demand letter, not a court finding, and I do not assert that she is guilty of any offence.
雙語版(英文與繁體中文)。本文為第042/SOMASI/RW/VIII/2026號律師函之摘要,發函日期為2026年8月31日,受函人 Aurelia Vizal 女士現於臺灣就讀。此為警告函,並非法院認定;本人不主張受函人已構成任何罪行。
English
Background
In September 2023 I was dismissed from AWS Indonesia during probation over a job title stated in one article. In October 2023 a viral post labelled me "the person who made his alma mater look bad." My letter states that Ms. Vizal, holder of X account @senjatanuklir and Instagram account @aureliavizal and a writer at Malaka Project, created and amplified negative content about me from October 2023 through mid-2026, reaching at least 100,000 views, including at times when I was doing nothing concerning her.
The verbatim posts, links and view counts were still being compiled when I sent the letter; the notice rests on a documented pattern, and the exact wording would be set out at the investigation stage.
Recipients
The letter went to Ms. Vizal personally, with copies to Malaka Project (attention: Mr. Ferry Irwandi), Ming Chuan University (Taiwan), the Indonesian Economic and Trade Office (KDEI) in Taipei, the Cyber Crime Directorate of the Indonesian National Police, and the Bekasi Metro Police service centre.



Legal basis (Indonesia)
Primary: Art. 433(2) KUHP (written defamation) and Art. 434 KUHP (slander), each aggravated by one-third under Art. 441(1) for use of information technology. Alternative and secondary: Art. 436 KUHP (minor insult) and Art. 45B jo. Art. 29 of the 2024 ITE Law (electronic intimidation). Civil claim: Civil Code Arts. 1365, 1366, 1372 and 1373. I stated openly that the "contrary to what is known" element of slander could not yet be confirmed.
Demands (deadline: Thursday, 3 September 2026, 17:00 WIB)
- Remove all content attacking my honour and good name, with proof;
- Publish a public apology on X and Instagram for at least 30 days;
- Cease further posts and amplification;
- Pay IDR 3,000,000,000 in immaterial damages (four times the IDR 750,000,000 maximum fine under Art. 45B jo. Art. 29), with material damages to be claimed separately.
Why a Taiwan section?
Because Ms. Vizal is physically in Taiwan, the letter also explained, in English with Chinese characters and pinyin, that Taiwan's Criminal Code Arts. 309, 310 and 311 and Civil Code Arts. 184 and 195 could apply, that she could face a complaint filed directly with a Taiwan prosecutors' office, and that Ming Chuan University's student affairs office could receive a code-of-conduct complaint. I acknowledged that extradition between Indonesia and Taiwan is discretionary and rarely used, and that mutual legal assistance would run through KDEI Taipei and the Taiwan Ministry of Justice. I described this as information, not as an excessive threat.
中文(繁體)
事件背景
2023年9月,本人於AWS印尼公司試用期間,因一篇文章中所載之職稱而遭解僱。2023年10月,一則廣傳貼文將本人標示為「使母校蒙羞之人」,隨後引發網路霸凌。本函指出,Aurelia Vizal 女士(X 帳號 @senjatanuklir、Instagram 帳號 @aureliavizal 之持有人,Malaka Project 撰稿人)自2023年10月起持續至2026年年中,反覆製作並放大貶損本人之內容,瀏覽量至少達100,000次,其中部分時期本人對其並無任何作為。
發函當時,各貼文之完整內容、連結與瀏覽數據仍在彙整中;本函係基於已記錄之行為模式,個別貼文之原文將於偵查階段提出。
受函人與副本
本函致 Aurelia Vizal 女士本人,副本致 Malaka Project(Ferry Irwandi 先生)、銘傳大學(臺灣)、駐臺北印尼經濟貿易辦事處(KDEI)、印尼國家警察刑事偵查局網路犯罪局,以及勿加泗市警察局綜合警務服務中心。
印尼法律依據
主要依據:印尼新刑法第433條第2項(書面誹謗)與第434條(誹謗罪之加重型態),並依第441條第1項因使用資訊科技加重三分之一。備位及次要依據:第436條(輕微侮辱)與2024年ITE法第45B條、第29條(電子恐嚇)。民事請求依據:印尼民法典第1365、1366、1372及1373條。本人已坦白說明,第434條「與行為人所知相反」之要件現階段尚無法確認,須於偵查中查證。
要求事項(期限:2026年9月3日星期四17時00分,印尼西部時間)
- 刪除攻擊本人名譽與名聲之一切內容,並提供刪除證明;
- 經由 X 與 Instagram 發布公開道歉,且至少維持30日;
- 停止一切後續貼文與放大行為;
- 賠償非財產上損害3,000,000,000印尼盾(以2024年ITE法第45B條、第29條最高罰金750,000,000印尼盾之4倍計算),財產上損害另於民事訴訟中請求。
為何附有臺灣法律部分
由於受函人現居臺灣,本函另以中文(附漢字與拼音)說明:臺灣《刑法》第309條(公然侮辱)、第310條(誹謗)、第311條,以及《民法》第184條、第195條可能適用;本人得直接向臺灣地方檢察署提出告訴;亦可向銘傳大學學生事務處提出違反校規之申訴。本函並坦承,印尼與臺灣之間之引渡屬裁量性質且極少運用,司法互助須透過駐臺北印尼經濟貿易辦事處與臺灣法務部進行。本人說明,此舉係提供資訊,並非過度威嚇。
本人所述之損害
本人於函中陳述,該等行為使本人名譽於逾100,000人面前受損,並促使本人躁鬱症復發、出現創傷後壓力症(PTSD)症狀,且社交孤立約1.5年。
Limits of this record | 本紀錄之限制
- This is my account and my legal reading; no court or authority has made a finding. 本文僅為本人陳述及法律見解,並無任何法院或機關之認定。
- Only profile and affiliation screenshots were attached, not the verbatim posts. 附件僅為檔案與所屬關係之截圖,未附各貼文原文。
- I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. 本人並非律師,本文不構成法律意見。
Right of reply | 答辯權
Ms. Aurelia Vizal is invited to respond, correct, or add context; a substantive reply may be published alongside this article, edited only for privacy, safety and relevance. 歡迎 Aurelia Vizal 女士回應、更正或補充說明,實質回應得於本文旁刊登,僅為隱私、安全及相關性而作必要編輯。
English-only edition: Letter of Demand No. 042 (English).
#Somasi #律師函 #Defamation #LegalNotice #Taiwan
Rahmat Wibowo, Founder & CEO, InfraLoka — infraloka.co.id