Infraloka Logo
Professional Blacklist: personal dispute documentation
Professional BlacklistCredential VerificationM I TClaims Vs Record

Marchel Andrian Shevchenko's "Research Student at MIT": What Would Count as Proof

Rahmat Wibowo·

LinkedIn education section listing MIT as "Research Student, Computer Science, Sep 2024 – Present" beside other institutions

A title like "Research Student" can mean many things. This article asks what documents would settle what it means in one public profile, instead of arguing from screenshots.

This is a methods piece. It does not conclude that the claim is false, and it does not conclude that it is true.

Scope and identity note

The profile belongs to Marchel Andrian Shevchenko, speaker at a Telkom AI Center of Excellence event on 8 November 2026. His LinkedIn education section lists "Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Student, Computer Science, Sep 2024 – Present", and his Instagram bio reads "Research Student @mit". The national higher-education database entry I captured lists him as an undergraduate at Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta. These are screenshots from around 29 August 2026 and are not authenticated. See the side-by-side.

Why the two entries are not automatically in conflict

An undergraduate elsewhere can do research with an MIT lab, through a volunteer arrangement, an online programme, a visiting scheme or a collaboration. "Research Student" is a loose phrase, not a degree. So the useful question is not "is he a PhD student" (his own "About" text says he is finishing an undergraduate degree), but "what is the actual relationship, and does the title describe it fairly".

What would count as proof

Ranked from strongest to weakest:

  1. Written confirmation from MIT (a department, lab or programme office) stating the nature and dates of the relationship.
  2. A letter from a named supervisor at MIT, on institutional letterhead, with a way to verify it.
  3. A programme record, such as acceptance into a named visiting or online research programme.
  4. Research output: a paper, preprint or repository showing the speaker as an author or contributor alongside MIT-affiliated researchers.
  5. A public acknowledgement from a lab or faculty member.

A profile, a bio or a third party's repeating of the title are not proof of the relationship.

What would count against it

Not finding items 1 to 5 does not count against it. Only a written statement from the institution that no such relationship exists would. I have not obtained one and do not claim to.

What I found

I have not found any item in the list above. That is limited to my own search, which is small, so it is not evidence of absence.

Where I may be wrong

  • The relationship may exist in a form that leaves no public trace.
  • I may have missed a paper or acknowledgement.
  • The title may be a loose but honest description.

What I asked for

I asked the Telkom Integrity Line to verify the claim from primary sources, which is the only route that gives an answer. See what I asked Telkom to do.

Right of reply and correction policy

Marchel Andrian Shevchenko is invited to send any of the documents above, or a response. Documents may be published alongside this article, subject to reasonable editing for privacy, safety and relevance. If reliable evidence shows that any factual statement here is wrong, I will correct it and note the change.

Published by Rahmat Wibowo, InfraLoka — infraloka.co.id

#ProfessionalBlacklist #CredentialVerification #MIT #ClaimsVsRecord