Infraloka Logo
← Back to Professional Blacklist
Professional Blacklist — personal dispute documentation
SomasiDisability RightsEmployment LawLegal Notice

Cahyo Subroto, President Director of PT Pena Teknologi Indonesia: Legal Notice No. 050/SOMASI/RW/IX/2026

Rahmat Wibowo·

Case record: Legal Notice No. 050/SOMASI/RW/IX/2026, addressed to MrScraper, attn. Cahyo Subroto

This post covers the part of Somasi No. 050/SOMASI/RW/IX/2026 that concerns Mr. Cahyo Subroto, named in my letter of 1 September 2026 as President Director of PT Pena Teknologi Indonesia, which operates MrScraper in Indonesia. The letter was issued in Indonesian and English. It is a legal notice, not a police report, court filing or finding. I do not assert that Mr. Subroto is guilty of any offence, and I have not seen a response from him. The company side is covered in a separate post.

Why he is named

Mr. Subroto is named because the letter is addressed to MrScraper "attn. Cahyo Subroto (President Director)," and because I worked for PT Pena Teknologi Indonesia as an "AI Engineer" from 8 August to 8 November 2025, a three-month probation. I understand him to have acted for the company in that engagement.

I state that I told him about my diagnosed psychosocial disability (a health condition) during the interview, before I started. That is my statement. In the letter's own element table, I mark it "to be proven by testimony or records."

What I complained about

My complaint is that the written terms of my engagement did not give a disclosed disability reasonable accommodation, and instead tied termination and evaluation to health. I do not reproduce the terms here. My argument is that, because the disability was already disclosed, those terms were not neutral.

Legal basis I relied on

I wrote the letter myself, without a lawyer. It cites Law 8/2016 on Persons with Disabilities (Arts. 4, 11, 43 and 45 on rights and reasonable accommodation, and Arts. 143 and 145 on obstructing those rights, up to 2 years and/or IDR 200 million). It also cites Arts. 5 and 6 of the Manpower Law, and Arts. 1320, 1338 and 1365 of the Civil Code (a term contrary to law is void). The letter states its own limit: Art. 145 is mainly an offence about obstructing access, and a court may find the civil and labour routes cleaner than a criminal one.

What I demanded

Of the company and Mr. Subroto, by 17:00 WIB on 4 September 2026: revise the employment terms to remove the health-related provisions and add a reasonable-accommodation clause. I also asked for a stamped statement that my disclosed disability would not be used against me, written co-operation with any inquiry, and IDR 1,500,000,000 in immaterial compensation, which I calculated as twice the IDR 750 million maximum fine under Art. 45B of the ITE Law. The letter said that if the demands were not met I would consider criminal complaints, a civil suit and administrative complaints to the manpower authorities and the National Commission on Disability.

Limits of this record

  • This is my account and my legal reading; no authority has made a finding.
  • The terms I complain about are not reproduced in this post, and I have not published the signed document.
  • The disclosure at interview is my statement and has no recording or document cited in the letter beyond the notation "to be proven."
  • The letter does not claim that Mr. Subroto personally operates the forum accounts that use Google, Amazon and Shopee names, and I do not claim that here.
  • A reader could see the health-related terms as ordinary employment practice rather than disability discrimination, and the "no reasonable accommodation" point depends on facts a court would test.
  • The IDR 1.5 billion figure is a demand, not an assessed loss. The letter itself says individual liability is for the authorities and a court.
  • I am not a lawyer, and this post is not legal advice.

Right of reply and correction

Mr. Cahyo Subroto and PT Pena Teknologi Indonesia are invited to respond, correct, or add context, including their account of the interview and the intent of the terms. A substantive reply may be published alongside this article, edited only for privacy, safety and relevance. If reliable evidence shows any statement here is wrong, I will correct it and note the change.

See also: the company-focused post on MrScraper and the follow-up complaint.

#Somasi #DisabilityRights #EmploymentLaw #LegalNotice #DigitalConduct